<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fiber Specs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggylife.com/2009/04/25/fiber-specs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggylife.com/2009/04/25/fiber-specs/</link>
	<description>my day to day thoughts!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:28:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggylife</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggylife.com/2009/04/25/fiber-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-3452</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggylife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggylife.com/?p=1879#comment-3452</guid>
		<description>Actually it&#039;s going to be a second firewall! Our main one is checkpoint and I LOVE it. Cisco will be with the basic features, no VPN, no QoS, no detection, prevention aka smartdefence, it&#039;s within our private network. As it with me these days and my bad memory, I forgot what we decided on! I&#039;ll check it out tomorrow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it&#8217;s going to be a second firewall! Our main one is checkpoint and I LOVE it. Cisco will be with the basic features, no VPN, no QoS, no detection, prevention aka smartdefence, it&#8217;s within our private network. As it with me these days and my bad memory, I forgot what we decided on! I&#8217;ll check it out tomorrow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBH</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggylife.com/2009/04/25/fiber-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-3326</link>
		<dc:creator>MBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggylife.com/?p=1879#comment-3326</guid>
		<description>http://icanhascheezburger.com/2009/04/28/funny-pictures-upgradedyur-firewall/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://icanhascheezburger.com/2009/04/28/funny-pictures-upgradedyur-firewall/" rel="nofollow">http://icanhascheezburger.com/2009/04/28/funny-pictures-upgradedyur-firewall/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBH</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggylife.com/2009/04/25/fiber-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-3315</link>
		<dc:creator>MBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggylife.com/?p=1879#comment-3315</guid>
		<description>I second Marzouq on Cisco. Their simple firewall is called Pix. ASA is too expensive and the features that they boast require licensing *each* and it&#039;s per user!

If you care to share what features are you looking for in a firewall and why do you need a firewall (don&#039;t have one now?), I may be able to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Marzouq on Cisco. Their simple firewall is called Pix. ASA is too expensive and the features that they boast require licensing *each* and it&#8217;s per user!</p>
<p>If you care to share what features are you looking for in a firewall and why do you need a firewall (don&#8217;t have one now?), I may be able to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marzouq</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggylife.com/2009/04/25/fiber-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-3296</link>
		<dc:creator>Marzouq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggylife.com/?p=1879#comment-3296</guid>
		<description>Most people use single mode, its rare to find multi-mode, and there isn&#039;t much of a reason for it. 

DONT GET THE CISCO FIREWALL!!! If you can go for something simpler go for it... I forgot what its called but don&#039;t get the ASA firewalls and avoid WatchGaurd firewalls, the ASA is annoying to configure with very low features for an expensive piece of equipment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people use single mode, its rare to find multi-mode, and there isn&#8217;t much of a reason for it. </p>
<p>DONT GET THE CISCO FIREWALL!!! If you can go for something simpler go for it&#8230; I forgot what its called but don&#8217;t get the ASA firewalls and avoid WatchGaurd firewalls, the ASA is annoying to configure with very low features for an expensive piece of equipment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggylife</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggylife.com/2009/04/25/fiber-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggylife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggylife.com/?p=1879#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>we have E1 multiplexer where each interface can go upto 2Mbps, this is for IP telephony only.

For Internet we link our fiber directly to our router.

Well we haven&#039;t bought the equipment yet, still in the poking around phase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have E1 multiplexer where each interface can go upto 2Mbps, this is for IP telephony only.</p>
<p>For Internet we link our fiber directly to our router.</p>
<p>Well we haven&#8217;t bought the equipment yet, still in the poking around phase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBH</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggylife.com/2009/04/25/fiber-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-3179</link>
		<dc:creator>MBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggylife.com/?p=1879#comment-3179</guid>
		<description>In our old HQ, we have the fiber laid to one branch and then another fiber cable to the HQ (branch &amp; HQ are near each other). At the HQ there&#039;s a converter from fiber to ethernet which goes to the core switch there. It&#039;s a dumb setup.

In the new HQ, we have fiber cables coming from the exchange to our server room, where the cores are terminated (single mode) to a mux which is connected to a router. One data router &amp; one Internet router.

The exchange is 7km away from our building, as I remember reading from the device that the technician had (who was terminating).

Which company are you dealing with? We deal with Khurafi Business Machines (KBM).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our old HQ, we have the fiber laid to one branch and then another fiber cable to the HQ (branch &amp; HQ are near each other). At the HQ there&#8217;s a converter from fiber to ethernet which goes to the core switch there. It&#8217;s a dumb setup.</p>
<p>In the new HQ, we have fiber cables coming from the exchange to our server room, where the cores are terminated (single mode) to a mux which is connected to a router. One data router &amp; one Internet router.</p>
<p>The exchange is 7km away from our building, as I remember reading from the device that the technician had (who was terminating).</p>
<p>Which company are you dealing with? We deal with Khurafi Business Machines (KBM).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

